Its like... a million bananas, in your ear

astrakiseki:

prokopetz:

unsurpassedtravesty:

dankotaxvx:

run-vegan:

alltsar:

corporatevagina:

pipedreamexplosion:

emmatavasci:

fucktheflagandfuckyou:

fucktheflagandfuckyou:

Say those three words and I’m yours

I hate capitalism

Fuck the police

Abolish wage slavery

Smash the patriarchy

Communism will win

I am vegan

I eat ass

Shrimp fried rice.

Never give up

Fuck me sideways.

Large semen intake

All hail our quenn Boxxy - Her beautiful and simple explanations of why Anita Sarkesian is full of shit is just perfect

good times

sjwstupidity:

bwarch:

endgaem:

moonstruck2:

endgaem:

Remember when I talked about feminists who look for reasons to be offended? This is exactly what I was talking about.
It’s one thing to enjoy playing video games and happen by a scene which is genuinely fucked up (I mean chances are it was intended to be fucked up; it’s like people complaining about the violence and drug use in Far Cry games), but it’s entirely another thing to grind through something you don’t even enjoy for a demographic you evidently dislike playing content that you barely understand, removing context and information, just so you can have a reason to take offence. It’s pathetic.

Let me get this straight. she plays a game for 8 hours, looking to be offended, and is mad when she can’t find something.

Yep, you got it on point.

The problem I have with this post is that Anita is doing research when she does this. “capture a particular scene” refers to her work in Femfreq about criticizing certain tropes and whatnot.
She played a game that she didn’t enjoy for the sake of that show and for that research. I’d prefer her work to be well-researched than otherwise.
Also, unpleasant in this context can totally refer to a game that she finds issue with from a writing standpoint, or issue with from a gameplay standpoint. Without further clarification we don’t even know.
I still haven’t even gotten around to watching Femfreq, I don’t even know if I’ll agree with it. More than likely as with most videos that offer this opinion shenanigans I’ll agree and disagree throughout. But this post is criticizing her in a really dumb way considering what she does. Research, guys, I mean really. “Looking for things to be offended about” My gods.

Doing research isn’t journalistic integrity when that research is done in search of supporting a pre-conceived notion.  She was playing a game she’d already decided she didn’t like just to get to a part of the game she wanted to use to bolster her point on an idea she’d already formulated.
Her entire series “Tropes vs Women,” is just a prolonged study in confirmation bias.  She doesn’t even bother to explore possibilities of video games celebrating female empowerment or instances where womens’ character outshines her sex appeal or anything like that.  Nope.  It’s just minute after minute of cherry picking perceived sexism with a sprinkling of buzzwords throughout.
I’m afraid the criticism stands.  She doesn’t even try to hide the fact that she gets no base enjoyment out of games.  That she’s an outsider simply looking for things to be displeased with to further her point.  She decided from the onset that video games are sexist and are somehow harmful to women…can you really call it “research” when she’s just looking for the evidence to support her conclusion, rather than looking for evidence so that she can draw a conclusion?

>Anita looks for 8 hours in a game for something she can use to call the game sexist
>fails
>complains about it
And some wonder why a lot of gamer’s can’t take her seriously? She’s actively looking for something to be offended by - and is offended when she can’t find anything?!

sjwstupidity:

bwarch:

endgaem:

moonstruck2:

endgaem:

Remember when I talked about feminists who look for reasons to be offended? This is exactly what I was talking about.

It’s one thing to enjoy playing video games and happen by a scene which is genuinely fucked up (I mean chances are it was intended to be fucked up; it’s like people complaining about the violence and drug use in Far Cry games), but it’s entirely another thing to grind through something you don’t even enjoy for a demographic you evidently dislike playing content that you barely understand, removing context and information, just so you can have a reason to take offence. It’s pathetic.

Let me get this straight. she plays a game for 8 hours, looking to be offended, and is mad when she can’t find something.

Yep, you got it on point.

The problem I have with this post is that Anita is doing research when she does this. “capture a particular scene” refers to her work in Femfreq about criticizing certain tropes and whatnot.

She played a game that she didn’t enjoy for the sake of that show and for that research. I’d prefer her work to be well-researched than otherwise.

Also, unpleasant in this context can totally refer to a game that she finds issue with from a writing standpoint, or issue with from a gameplay standpoint. Without further clarification we don’t even know.

I still haven’t even gotten around to watching Femfreq, I don’t even know if I’ll agree with it. More than likely as with most videos that offer this opinion shenanigans I’ll agree and disagree throughout. But this post is criticizing her in a really dumb way considering what she does. Research, guys, I mean really. “Looking for things to be offended about” My gods.

Doing research isn’t journalistic integrity when that research is done in search of supporting a pre-conceived notion.  She was playing a game she’d already decided she didn’t like just to get to a part of the game she wanted to use to bolster her point on an idea she’d already formulated.

Her entire series “Tropes vs Women,” is just a prolonged study in confirmation bias.  She doesn’t even bother to explore possibilities of video games celebrating female empowerment or instances where womens’ character outshines her sex appeal or anything like that.  Nope.  It’s just minute after minute of cherry picking perceived sexism with a sprinkling of buzzwords throughout.

I’m afraid the criticism stands.  She doesn’t even try to hide the fact that she gets no base enjoyment out of games.  That she’s an outsider simply looking for things to be displeased with to further her point.  She decided from the onset that video games are sexist and are somehow harmful to women…can you really call it “research” when she’s just looking for the evidence to support her conclusion, rather than looking for evidence so that she can draw a conclusion?

>Anita looks for 8 hours in a game for something she can use to call the game sexist

>fails

>complains about it

And some wonder why a lot of gamer’s can’t take her seriously? She’s actively looking for something to be offended by - and is offended when she can’t find anything?!

three-patch-problem3:

ishouldntbeallowedoutinpublic:

who-lock-loki-lover:

amhil-has-thoughts:

riddleswithtom:

hatalie:

9 has no time for your philosophizing.

nine is tired of your crap

Nine was the sassiest. 

I don’t think I’ll ever be able to scroll past this gifset without reblogging.

Can we also appreciate Rose please? She’s like his back up sassyness and being all “Bitch please, not today.”

9 was sass

10 was je-sas

11 was funniest

12 is… spoopy

richwhitecismale:

cat-servant:

ugh-sjws:

richwhitecismale:

This is a must read for all you sjw fanatics out there.

To any interest in checking out her book, it can be found here: http://www.amazon.com/Self-Made-Man-Womans-Year-Disguised/dp/0143038702

This research is a gamechanger. She’s going to take so much flak for it…

Unfortunately yes she will. Sad really.

Beautiful story.

An excerpt:

"Men are suffering. They have different problems than women have, but they don’t have it better," she said. "They need our sympathy. They need our love, and maybe they need each other more than anything else. They need to be together."

custat:

siphersaysstuff:

knight-of-tuxedo:

otakuforlifev2:

Oh god why?!!

Popeye the Sailor Moon

By the power of me spinach, I will pulveratize ya.

We have now reached the apex of evolution.

Sailor Popeye
Spinach Makeup Powers!

custat:

siphersaysstuff:

knight-of-tuxedo:

otakuforlifev2:

Oh god why?!!

Popeye the Sailor Moon

By the power of me spinach, I will pulveratize ya.

We have now reached the apex of evolution.

Sailor Popeye

Spinach Makeup Powers!

This is the cutest cookies ever

poorpoorpitifulme:

64bitwar:

anti-feminism-pro-equality:

truestfeminist:

Even the worlds best economists CONTINUE to deny the existence of a legitimate wage gap.

Maybe thats a fucking hint.

Nope. All the experts are wrong. My agenda is right. No, these economists don’t…

This is delightfully amusing

You do realize that 8 year olds cannot give any kind of consent, right? When the woman stopped raping him, he was 10, which is still well below the age of consent, meaning that it was rape. If you cannot see that, then you should never go around children.
Anonymous

aedrex1994:

kermitismywaifu:

Statuatory Rape -

1. sexual intercourse with a GIRL under the age of consent, which age varies in different states.

Theoretically, the boy could give consent through parents, in the idea that if they were caught, he could suggest to his parents not to press charges which is necessary in a court of law.

And its okay I despise most kids anyway.

The fuck is wrong with you?

What’s wrong with him? Simple: He’s an SJW, clearly.

and what if its a man doing it on an 8yr old boy? The same? Ok.

What if the woman uses a strapon?

Gods - the idiocy of this kind of people.

billthemanfromkentucky:

The Email I received from the SFPD in regards to last night’s story

Officer Albie Esparza #4150
Public Information Officer
San Francisco Police Department
Office of the Chief of Police
Media Relations Unit

Greetings, first off, let me just thank you for taking the time to read…

And we have a winner!

Bill provides dox that debunk Anita’s death threat story.

If he only had his Ask open, so I could tell I want to buy him a pint for doing this. Because seriously, this is beautiful.